ADIPS Poster Presentation Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society and Society of Obstetric Medicine Australia and New Zealand Joint Scientific Meeting 2025

Potential impact of revising the New Zealand diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes on maternal and infant perinatal outcomes (#111)

Qiliang Liu 1 2 , Jane Harding 1 , Greg Gamble 1 , Carl Eagleton 1 2 , Lisa Dawes 1 , Caroline Anne Crowther 1
  1. The University of Auckland Liggins Institute, Auckland, AUCKLAND, New Zealand
  2. Endocrinology, Te Whatu Ora Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Background: Revised diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes (GDM) in New Zealand on 75g oral glucose tolerance tests include lowering the fasting glucose (>5.5 to >5.3 mmol/L), adding a 1-h glucose (>10.6 mmol/L), and removing the 2-h glucose (>9.0 mmol/L). We assessed effects of these changes on demographics of those diagnosed and their perinatal outcomes.

Methods: Participants in the GEMS trial were grouped as meeting only the revised criteria (Additional group), only the current criteria so missed by the revised criteria (Missed group), both criteria (Both-Criteria group), and neither criteria (Non-GDM group).

Results: Among 3921 participants, GDM prevalence was 6.8% by the revised and 5.8% by current criteria (risk ratio 1.18, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.40). Women in the Additional (n=125) and Missed groups (n=83), compared to women in the Non-GDM group (n=3562), were more likely to be overweight/obese, have a family history of diabetes and be of Asian ethnicity. Women in the Additional-Treated group had less gestational weight gain but more induced labours compared to women without GDM, while their infants were born earlier, had lower birthweight, and more neonatal hypoglycaemia(all P<0ยท01). Compared to the Both-Criteria group (n=151), women in the Missed group had lower BMI, were less likely to be Pacific, required less pharmacotherapy, and experienced fewer postpartum haemorrhages.

Conclusions: Using the revised criteria will increase GDM diagnoses by identifying an additional high-risk group of women likely to benefit from treatment, although 35.5% of women currently treated for GDM will no longer be diagnosed, potentially compromising their health.